The universe unraveled by HannaH

The universe unraveled by HannaH

“Bei allen zweifelhaften Fragen ist Glauben die Sache des Unwissenden, Entscheiden die des Halbgelehrten, Prüfen und Suchen die des wahren Kenners." Herr Professor Webers Erdinduktor.

Nothing moves, just rotation

KnowledgePosted by Hanne Mon, December 10, 2018 14:15:55
START AT 10:09

  • Comments(0)//


KnowledgePosted by Hanne Fri, December 07, 2018 10:46:14

Our planet is a condenser, which regenerates the degenerated light of the stars into a brilliant point, exactly as the radio condenses expanded sounds out of apparent silence … WR

  • Comments(0)//

Creation and multiplication of power

KnowledgePosted by Hanne Sat, December 01, 2018 11:10:47!album-27-239

A while ago, I introduced the term coherence. According to Ken Wheeler, a magnet is a coherent system. So what is coherence ?… The image above on the left (Walter Russell) is showing the structure of a magnet, as a power multiplication device. Coherence is power multiplication and it can be compared to a spoon stirring in a glass of water. Introduce rotation in a system and you will multiply power …. In practical terms it means that the system, rotates around a single point of gravity ..

  • Comments(0)//

Euler and the ether

KnowledgePosted by Hanne Fri, November 30, 2018 12:15:24


The true Principle of Nature, on which are founded all the Phenomena of Electricity.

The summary I have exhibited of the principal phenomena of electricity, has no doubt excited a curiosity to know what occult powers of nature are capable of producing effects so surprizing.

The greatest part of natural philosophers acknowledge their ignorance in this respect. They appear to be so dazzled by the endless variety of phenomena, which every day present themselves, and by the singularly marvellous circumstances which accompany these phenomena, that they are discouraged from attempting an investigation of the true cause of them.

They readily admit the existence of a subtile matter, which is the primary agent in the production of the phenomena, and which they denominate the electric fluid ; but they are so embarrassed about determining its nature and properties, that this important branch of physics is rendered only more perplexed by their researches.

There is no room to doubt, that we must look for the source of all the phenomena of electricity only in a certain fluid and subtile matter ; but we have no need to go to the regions of imagination in quest of it. That subtile matter denominated ether, whose reality I have already endeavoured to demontrate, is sufficient very naturally to explain all the surprizing effects which electricity presents. I hope I shall be able to set this in so clear a light, that you shall be able to account for every electrical phenomenon, however strange an -appearance it may assume.

The great requisite is to have a thorough knowledge of the nature of ether.

The air which we breathe rises only to a certain height above the surface of the earth ; the higher you ascend, the more subtile it becomes, and at last it entirely ceases. We must not affirm, that beyond the region of the air there is a perfect vacuum, which occupies the immense space in which the heavenly bodies revolve.

The rays of light which are diffused in all directions from these heavenly bodies, sufficiently demonstrate that those vast spaces are filled with a subtile matter.

If the rays of light are emanations forcibly projected from luminous bodies, as some philosophers have maintained, it must follow, that the whole space of the heavens is filled with these rays, nay that they move through it with incredible rapidity. You have only to recollect the prodigious velocity with which the rays of the sun are transmitted to us. On this hypothesis, not only would there be no vacuum, but all space would be filled with a subtile matter, and that in a state of constant and most dreadful agitation.

But I think I have clearly proved, that rays of light are no more emanations projected from luminous bodies, than sound is from sonorous bodies. It is much more certain, that rays of light are nothing else but a tremulous motion or agitation of a subtile matter, just as sound consists of a similar agitation excited in the air. And as sound is produced and transmitted by the air, light is produced and transmitted by that matter, incomparably more subtile, denominated ether, which consequently fills the immense space between the heavenly bodies.

Ether then is a medium proper for the transmission of rays of light, and this same quality puts us in a condition to extend our knowledge of its nature and properties. We have only to reflect on the properties of air, which render it adapted to the reception and transmission of sound. The principal cause is its elasticity or spring. You know that air has a power of expanding itself in all directions, and that it does expand, the instant that obstacles are removed. The air is never at rest, but when its elasticity is every where the same ; whenever it is greater in one place than another, the air immediately expands. We likewise discover by experiment, that the more the air is compressed, the more its elasticity increases : hence the force of air-guns, in whichthe air, being very strongly compressed, is capableof discharging the ball with astonishing velocity. The contrary takes place when, the air is rarefied : its elasticity becomes less in proportion as it is more rarified, or diffused over a larger space.

On the elasticity of the air, then, relative to its density, depends the velocity of sound, which makes a progress of about 1ooo feet in a second. If the elasticity of the air were increased, its density remaining the same, the velocity of sound would increase : and the same thing would take place if the air were more rare, or less dense than it is, its elasticity being the same. In general, the more that any medium, similar to air, is elastic, and at the same time less dense, the more rapidly will the agitations excited in it be transmitted. And as light is transmitted so many thousand times more rapidly than sound, it must clearly follow, that the ether, that medium whose agitations constitute light, is many thousand times more elastic than air, and, at the same time, many thousand times more rare or more subtile, both of these qualities contributing toaccelerate the propagation of light.

Such is the reason which leads to conclude, that ether is many thousand times more elastic and more subtile than air ; its nature being in other respects similar to that of air, in as much as it is likewise a fluid matter, and susceptible of compression and of rarefaction. It is this quality which will conduct us to the explanation of all the phenomena of electricity.

  • Comments(0)//


KnowledgePosted by Hanne Thu, November 29, 2018 14:20:08!album-27-236

A universal kiss:!album-27-237!album-27-238

  • Comments(0)//

What if 2 ...

KnowledgePosted by Hanne Thu, November 29, 2018 10:34:51!album-27-235

Compare blue part to this, which is a model (Eric Dollard) for what is happening around a wire when electricity is turned on:

  • Comments(0)//

What if ... A HYPOTHESIS

ThinkingPosted by Hanne Tue, November 27, 2018 16:21:27

Image above: Copyright by HannaH!album-27-230!album-27-231

The orbits are not ellipses but helical or spiral motion, see below:!album-27-232!album-27-233

Resonance, alignment:!album-27-234

Notice: the above drawings are part of a hypothesis. Studying the available models brought up some questions, like if the asteroid belt is a exploded planet, why is it not placed at the apex of a wave …

If the solar system is an electrical phenomenon, which I believe it is, how do the available models relate to each other?

  • Comments(0)//

Titius - Bode and numbers

KnowledgePosted by Hanne Tue, November 27, 2018 12:12:05
The law of Titius-Bode, previously incorrectly called the law of Bode, is a formula from astronomy published by the German astronomer Bode (1747-1826) and discovered in 1766 by Titius (1729-1796), but later it turned out to be no natural law at all. She gives the distance from planets to the sun according to their rank number.

Based on this law, Titius too concluded that there was something missing between Mars and Jupiter.

In his 1766 translation of Bonnet's work, Johann Daniel Titius added some of his own paragraphs. There are two parts to Titius's intercalated text. The first part explains the succession of planetary distances from the Sun:

Take notice of the distances of the planets from one another, and recognize that almost all are separated from one another in a proportion which matches their bodily magnitudes. Divide the distance from the Sun to Saturn into 100 parts; then Mercury is separated by four such parts from the Sun, Venus by 4+3=7 such parts, the Earth by 4+6=10, Mars by 4+12=16. But notice that from Mars to Jupiter there comes a deviation from this so exact progression. From Mars there follows a space of 4+24=28 such parts, but so far no planet was sighted there. But should the Lord Architect have left that space empty? Not at all. Let us therefore assume that this space without doubt belongs to the still undiscovered satellites of Mars, let us also add that perhaps Jupiter still has around itself some smaller ones which have not been sighted yet by any telescope. Next to this for us still unexplored space there rises Jupiter's sphere of influence at 4+48=52 parts; and that of Saturn at 4+96=100 parts.

Also the following footnote was found in Johann Elert Bode’s second edition of his astronomical compendium Anleitung zur Kenntniss des gestirnten Himmels (1772), initially unsourced, but credited to Titius in later versions (in Bode's memoir can be found a reference to Titius with clear recognition of his priority):

This latter point seems in particular to follow from the astonishing relation which the known six planets observe in their distances from the Sun. Let the distance from the Sun to Saturn be taken as 100, then Mercury is separated by 4 such parts from the Sun. Venus is 4+3=7. The Earth 4+6=10. Mars 4+12=16. Now comes a gap in this so orderly progression. After Mars there follows a space of 4+24=28 parts, in which no planet has yet been seen. Can one believe that the Founder of the universe had left this space empty? Certainly not. From here we come to the distance of Jupiter by 4+48=52 parts, and finally to that of Saturn by 4+96=100 parts.

Take notice that, those are exactly the numbers of Kepler’s geometric row, as mentioned in my previous blogpost.

The Titius equation is:

a = 0,4 + 0,3 × 2^(n - 2)


a distance of planet in astronomical units

n ranknummer of planet, measured from sun.



Calculated distance from sun

Real distance from sun

n = 1

a = 0,4 + 0,15 = 0,55
(or if n = – Ꝏ:
a = 0,4 + 0,0 = 0,4)

(Mercury): 0,387

n = 2

a = 0,4 + 0,3 = 0,7

(Venus): 0,723

n = 3

a = 0,4 + 0,6 = 1,0

(Earth): 1,000

n = 4

a = 0,4 + 1,2 = 1,6

(Mars): 1,524

n = 5

a = 0,4 + 2,4 = 2,8

Almost correct for Ceres and the planetoïds:

a ~ 2,8

n = 6

a = 0,4 + 4,8 = 5,2

(Jupiter): 5,203

n = 7

a = 0,4 + 9,6 = 10,0

(Saturn): 9,537

n = 8

a = 0,4 + 19,2 = 19,6

(Uranus): 19,191

n = 9

a = 0,4 + 38,4 = 38,8

(Neptune 30,069)
Pluto 39,482

n = 10

a = 0,4 + 76,8 = 77,2

Distance where scatterd disc objects of KuiperBelt are to be found, like dwarplanet Eris (67,8); they do have very excentric orbits

When Uranus was discovered in 1781 and Ceres in 1801, these discoveries were considered a strong proof that the law was true and reliable. For the later discovered planet Neptune (1846) and dwarf planet Pluto (1930), the actual distance significantly decreased.

Some astronomers believe that the phenomenon of path resonance can explain the space between the planets to a certain extent. However, it is assumed today that it is a mathematical 'coincidence':

But is this merely a "coïncidence" or is there a real unified concept behind it?

One of Albert Einstein’s most famous statements is “God does not play dice with the universe”. His use of the word God is to be interpreted as the existence of natural laws of great mathematical beauty, whatever form they might take. He felt that natural laws could not be like the throw of dice, with inherent randomness or probability, which excludes coïncidence …

My personal intake, based on what I have discovered so far, is that there are no coïncidences at all. There is indeed a governing law. So will I be able to prove it ?


  • Comments(0)//
Next »